Ken has posted the following question (which I'm reposting here to separate it from a patch notice which I don't think it relates to):
This is a simple question. I have put 5.0(985) out on some systems. I use to do compil/a/m/x:2 this was my standard. Now this complains about a lot of things. If I leave off the x:2 it is fine.
Before I change my DO files to remove the X:2, which is no problem, I just want to make sure this is a permenant thing.
I must confess that I have no idea what you're talking about. There has certainly been no explicit plan to remove support for the compil /x:2 switch. In fact, we use that for virtually everything in the SOSLIB, as well as all of the LITs. And although there were a couple of compiler patches between 984 and 985, I don't think there has been any change to the command line processing of COMPIL.LIT for a long time.
Furthermore, removing /x:2 from your command line is going to remove support for all of the A-Shell extensions (functions, procedures, switch, dimx, etc), although many are available with /rc switch also.
Can you give me an explicit example of a command line syntax that fails, so we can get to the bottom of this?